Just found this mate:The v6 is about 204 bhp
The vr6 makes about150ish bhp
So I'm led to beleive
And the golf version is a bit less than the 2.9 that was in the corradoIsn't the VR6 a bit strangled and makes a lot less power than the golf version,
but the V6 has a lot more power?
Just found this mate:
2.8 VR6 AES VR6 DOHC 12v 2,792 cc (170.4 cu in) 140 PS (103 kW; 138 bhp) @ 4,500 240 N·m (177 ft·lbf) @ 3,000 1996–2000
2.8 V6 AMV, AXK VR6 DOHC 24v 2,792 cc (170.4 cu in) 204 PS (150 kW; 201 bhp) @ 6,200 245 N·m (181 ft·lbf) @ 2,500 2000–2003
Fair play you were pretty close!, I wonder what it takes to get it to golf power, ECU? injectors?There you go, wasn't too far outI:
It's a bit of a difference power wise isn't it:*
Is feel cheated in the vr6![]()
The 200 bhp golf is a 24 valve engine with variable valve timingFair play you were pretty close!, I wonder what it takes to get it to golf power, ECU? injectors?
I'm on about the MK3 Golf VR6 mate, 172bhp iirc.The 200 bhp golf is a 24 valve engine with variable valve timing
The 2.8 in the t4 and mk3 golfs are 12v engines
Totally different engines T:
And never understood why they put the 190 bhp 2.9 in the corrado and not the golfI'm on about the MK3 Golf VR6 mate, 172bhp iirc.
a fair bit mate..how much power can you get out of a 2.5 petrol?